Connect with us

Bitcoin

The Bitcoin Act: A Bold Proposal to Buy 1 Million BTC Under Consideration by Congress

Published

on

On March 11, 2025, U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) and Congressman Nick Begich (R-AK) reintroduced the Boosting Innovation, Technology, and Competitiveness through Optimized Investment Nationwide (BITCOIN) Act of 2025, a landmark piece of legislation that aims to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR) by directing the U.S. government to purchase 1 million Bitcoin (BTC) over a five-year period. As of today, March 13, 2025, this ambitious proposal is under consideration by Congress, stirring both excitement and skepticism across financial, political, and cryptocurrency circles. The bill, which aligns with President Donald Trump’s recent executive order on digital assets, seeks to position the United States as a leader in the digital economy while addressing long-term economic challenges like the national debt. However, its path to becoming law is far from certain, and the implications of such a move are hotly debated.

The Core of the BITCOIN Act

The BITCOIN Act, first introduced by Senator Lummis in July 2024, proposes that the U.S. Treasury acquire 1 million BTC—approximately 5% of Bitcoin’s total capped supply of 21 million coins—through a structured purchase program. The plan mandates the acquisition of up to 200,000 BTC annually over five years, with the assets held in a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve for at least 20 years. At current prices (around $80,000 per BTC as of early March 2025), this would amount to an $80 billion investment, though market dynamics could push the cost higher if demand surges during the buying process.

The legislation outlines several key provisions to ensure transparency and security. The Treasury would manage the SBR through a decentralized network of secure Bitcoin vaults, utilizing the highest standards of physical and cybersecurity. Independent proof-of-reserve audits would be conducted to maintain public trust, leveraging Bitcoin’s blockchain transparency to verify holdings. Additionally, the bill prohibits the Treasury from selling more than 10% of the reserve in any two-year period, aiming to ensure long-term stability. States would also be allowed to establish their own Bitcoin reserves in segregated accounts, encouraging broader adoption at the state level.

Funding for the purchases is designed to be budget-neutral, avoiding new taxpayer burdens. The bill proposes using Federal Reserve remittances—specifically the first $6 billion of annual earnings from 2025 to 2029—and revaluing the Federal Reserve’s gold certificates to reflect current market prices, with the difference used to finance the Bitcoin acquisitions. This approach mirrors the U.S.’s historical management of strategic assets like gold, framing Bitcoin as a modern equivalent or “digital gold.”

A Strategic Vision for America’s Financial Future

Proponents of the BITCOIN Act, including Lummis and Begich, argue that a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is a national imperative. Speaking at the Bitcoin Policy Institute’s “Bitcoin for America” summit on March 11, 2025, Lummis stated, “Bitcoin is not simply a technological opportunity, but a national imperative for America’s continued financial leadership in the 21st century.” She emphasized that the reserve could help address the U.S.’s $35 trillion national debt by diversifying federal holdings with an asset expected to appreciate over time. Investment firm VanEck has projected that if the U.S. accumulates 1 million BTC by 2029, the reserve could be worth $21 trillion by 2049, potentially offsetting a significant portion of the national debt.

The bill also aligns with broader geopolitical goals. With nations like China and Russia exploring digital currencies and diversifying away from the U.S. dollar, supporters argue that a Bitcoin reserve would reinforce America’s economic sovereignty and global competitiveness. Congressman Begich highlighted this during the summit, saying, “This is a bold and forward-looking legislative initiative designed to ensure the United States secures its financial independence and maintains its leadership in the global digital economy.” The legislation also affirms the right of individuals and businesses to own and transact Bitcoin freely, prohibiting federal interference with self-custody rights—a nod to the crypto community’s emphasis on financial sovereignty.

President Trump’s executive order on March 7, 2025, which established a federal Bitcoin reserve using the government’s existing 208,109 BTC (seized from criminal activities), has provided political momentum for the BITCOIN Act. However, Trump’s order focused on managing existing assets rather than new purchases, making the BITCOIN Act a more aggressive step. David Bailey, CEO of Bitcoin Magazine, noted that the executive order “clears the political lane” for Congress to prioritize this legislation, suggesting that both executive and legislative actions are needed for a robust SBR.

Challenges and Criticisms

Despite the enthusiasm, the BITCOIN Act faces significant hurdles. The bill, which failed to gain traction in the 2023-2024 congressional session due to limited bipartisan support, currently has only Republican cosponsors in the Senate, including Jim Justice (R-WV), Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), Roger Marshall (R-KS), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), and Bernie Moreno (R-OH). Posts on X reflect cautious sentiment, with users noting that the bill is in its early stages and requires committee approval and full votes in both chambers, a process that has historically stalled crypto legislation.

Critics argue that the proposal is fraught with risks. Bitcoin’s volatility—evident in its recent drop from $109,000 to $78,000—could lead to significant losses if prices decline after the government’s purchases. Dr. Arash Aloosh, a finance professor at Dublin City University, has expressed skepticism, stating that endorsing Bitcoin as a national asset contradicts the government’s traditionally cautious stance on crypto, especially given the U.S.’s $1.8 trillion budget deficit. He questions whether the government would borrow further—potentially from nations like China, which holds $775 billion in U.S. Treasuries—to fund such a speculative investment.

The funding mechanism also raises concerns. While the bill aims to be budget-neutral, revaluing gold certificates and redirecting Federal Reserve earnings could have unintended consequences for monetary policy. Some economists worry that large-scale Bitcoin purchases could drive up prices, benefiting early adopters but creating a bubble that might burst, leaving taxpayers to bear the cost. Others, like Laith Khalaf of AJ Bell, highlight Bitcoin’s unsuitability as a reserve asset due to its dramatic price swings, which could undermine its role as a stable store of value compared to traditional assets like gold.

A Global Race for Digital Dominance

The BITCOIN Act is also seen as a response to a global race for cryptocurrency adoption. Nations like El Salvador, which holds nearly 6,000 BTC, have already embraced Bitcoin as a national asset, while others are exploring similar moves. Bailey has warned that other countries might “frontrun” the U.S. by building their own Bitcoin reserves, a concern echoed by Lummis, who has called the legislation “an idea whose time has come.” The bill’s supporters argue that failing to act could cede financial leadership to competitors, especially as Bitcoin’s market cap surpasses $1.2 trillion and institutional adoption grows.

However, the proposal’s focus on Bitcoin alone—excluding other cryptocurrencies like Ethereum or stablecoins—has drawn scrutiny. Some analysts question whether Bitcoin’s “digital gold” narrative oversimplifies its role in a broader digital asset ecosystem, potentially ignoring more practical use cases offered by other tokens. The White House’s position, which emphasizes holding Bitcoin indefinitely for “long-term value” rather than eventual sales, also contrasts with the BITCOIN Act’s provision allowing limited sales after 20 years, highlighting a strategic divergence.

The Road Ahead

As of March 13, 2025, the BITCOIN Act is in the early stages of the legislative process, awaiting committee review in the Senate Banking Committee, where Lummis now chairs the digital assets subcommittee. The bill’s bicameral introduction, with Begich’s companion legislation in the House, demonstrates growing congressional interest, but bipartisan support remains elusive. Democrats like Ro Khanna (D-CA) have expressed openness to Bitcoin, but the broader party’s stance is uncertain, especially after crypto PACs targeted figures like Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) in the 2024 elections.

The proposal’s fate will likely depend on political dynamics in the 119th Congress, where a Republican-controlled House and a potentially favorable Senate Banking Committee chair in Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) could provide a path forward. However, the bill’s reliance on Republican support and its controversial funding model may hinder its passage. If enacted, the BITCOIN Act could mark a seismic shift in U.S. monetary policy, positioning Bitcoin as a formal reserve asset and reshaping the global financial landscape. For now, though, it remains a bold vision—one that could either propel the U.S. into a new era of digital finance or falter under the weight of economic and political realities.

Explain funding mechanism

Global crypto adoption

More concise summary

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. CoinReporter.io and EUReporter.co does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Bitcoin

SEC Confirms Bitcoin and Proof of Work Mining Are Not Securities: A Game-Changer for the Crypto Industry

Published

on

By

On March 20, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) delivered a landmark decision that has sent ripples through the cryptocurrency industry: Bitcoin and Proof of Work (PoW) mining do not constitute securities under U.S. law. This long-awaited regulatory clarification, announced by the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance, provides a significant boost to Bitcoin miners and the broader blockchain ecosystem, removing a cloud of uncertainty that has loomed over the industry for years. As the crypto sector navigates an evolving regulatory landscape under the Trump administration, this ruling could pave the way for renewed growth and innovation in the United States.

A Defining Moment for Bitcoin and PoW Mining

The SEC’s statement marks a pivotal moment for Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, and other PoW-based networks like Litecoin, Dogecoin, and Monero. The agency clarified that “Protocol Mining” on public, permissionless PoW networks does not meet the criteria of an “investment contract” under the Howey Test—a legal standard used to determine whether an asset qualifies as a security. The Howey Test, established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1946, defines a security as an investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits derived from the efforts of others. The SEC’s ruling hinges on the decentralized nature of PoW mining, where miners independently contribute computational power to secure the network and validate transactions, earning rewards in the form of newly minted Bitcoin.

The SEC emphasized that neither solo miners nor those participating in mining pools are engaging in activities that depend on the managerial efforts of others. “A miner’s Self (or Solo) Mining is not undertaken with a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others,” the agency stated. Instead, miners are performing an “administrative or ministerial” role by securing the network and receiving rewards based on the protocol’s rules. Mining pools, where multiple miners combine their computational resources to increase their chances of earning rewards, were also exempted. The SEC noted that pool operators’ roles are administrative rather than managerial, and participants retain the freedom to leave pools at any time, further underscoring the lack of a centralized authority.

This decision aligns with previous statements from U.S. regulators. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has long classified Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Dogecoin as commodities, not securities. Additionally, the SEC has consistently treated Bitcoin as distinct from other cryptocurrencies. As far back as 2018, then-SEC Director of Corporate Finance William Hinman declared that Bitcoin and Ether were not securities due to their decentralized structures. More recently, in 2023, former SEC Chair Gary Gensler reiterated that Bitcoin is the only cryptocurrency he would call a commodity, citing its lack of a central issuer—a key factor in the SEC’s current ruling on PoW mining.

Implications for the Crypto Industry

The SEC’s clarification has far-reaching implications for Bitcoin miners and the broader crypto industry. For years, miners in the United States have operated under regulatory uncertainty, fearing that their activities might be deemed securities transactions, subjecting them to stringent registration and reporting requirements. This ruling removes that burden, providing legal certainty that miners—whether solo or in pools—do not need to register their activities with the SEC or seek exemptions under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Cody Carbone, president of The Digital Chamber, a blockchain advocacy group, called the decision “big news” for Bitcoin miners. “This gives much-needed legal certainty and clears the path for the mining industry to grow in the U.S.,” Carbone stated in a post on X. Indeed, the ruling could encourage more mining operations to establish or expand in the United States, potentially positioning the country as a global leader in Bitcoin mining. The U.S. already ranks as the top destination for Bitcoin mining, hosting over 37% of the global hashrate as of 2023, according to the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index. With regulatory clarity, this share could grow further, attracting investment and fostering innovation in mining infrastructure.

The decision also bolsters confidence in Bitcoin as an asset. By reaffirming that Bitcoin is not a security, the SEC reinforces its status as a commodity, aligning with the CFTC’s jurisdiction. This could pave the way for more institutional adoption, particularly following the SEC’s approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in January 2024. Investors may now feel more secure knowing that Bitcoin’s foundational activity—mining—operates outside the SEC’s securities framework, reducing the risk of regulatory overreach.

A Shift Under the Trump Administration

The SEC’s ruling comes amid a broader shift in the U.S. government’s approach to cryptocurrency under President Donald Trump’s administration. Since taking office in January 2025, Trump has positioned himself as a pro-crypto leader, vowing to make the U.S. a global hub for blockchain and digital assets. His administration has taken several crypto-friendly steps, including the establishment of the Council of Advisers on Digital Assets to develop industry-friendly regulations. The SEC, now led by Republican acting Chair Mark Uyeda following Gary Gensler’s departure, has also adopted a more accommodating stance. Recent actions include rescinding controversial crypto accounting guidance, dropping enforcement actions against major crypto players, and re-examining rules affecting the industry.

This ruling on PoW mining is the latest in a series of moves that signal a friendlier regulatory environment. Just days ago, the SEC released a statement on memecoins, and a newly formed crypto task force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, is set to meet to discuss the “security status” of various digital assets. These developments suggest that the SEC is reevaluating its approach to crypto, moving away from the enforcement-heavy strategy of the Gensler era, which saw 26 crypto-related enforcement actions in 2023 alone.

A Critical Perspective: What’s Missing?

While the SEC’s decision has been widely celebrated, it’s worth examining what the ruling does not address. The statement focuses narrowly on PoW mining and does not extend to Proof of Stake (PoS) networks like Ethereum, which transitioned to PoS in 2022. PoS networks often involve staking, where users lock up tokens to validate transactions and earn rewards—a process that some argue could meet the Howey Test’s criteria due to its reliance on network operators or validators. The SEC has previously targeted PoS-based tokens like Solana, Cardano, and Polygon, labeling them as securities in lawsuits against exchanges like Coinbase and Binance in 2023. The lack of clarity on PoS mechanisms leaves a significant portion of the crypto industry in regulatory limbo.

Moreover, the SEC’s ruling does not address the broader question of how Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies should be regulated beyond mining. While Bitcoin itself is not a security, its use in financial products, trading platforms, and lending or staking services could still attract scrutiny. The SEC has warned investors about the risks of crypto asset securities, noting that unregistered platforms may lack investor protections. The agency’s enforcement actions against exchanges and DeFi platforms suggest that regulatory challenges persist, even as mining receives a green light.

Another point of concern is the environmental impact of PoW mining, which the SEC’s statement does not address. Bitcoin mining consumes significant energy—estimated at 127 terawatt-hours annually by the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index, more than the entire country of Norway. Critics argue that this energy-intensive process contributes to climate change, and some governments have imposed restrictions on mining activities. While the SEC’s ruling focuses on securities law, future regulations from other agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, could impact the industry’s growth.

Global Context and Future Outlook

The SEC’s decision comes at a time when global attitudes toward Bitcoin are shifting. Countries like Argentina and Pakistan, as reported earlier this year, are exploring crypto-friendly policies to attract investment and combat economic instability. Argentina’s Senate recently hosted its first-ever conference on Bitcoin and regulatory frameworks, while Pakistan is reportedly set to legalize Bitcoin to attract foreign investment. Meanwhile, Russia has legalized crypto mining and is experimenting with stablecoins for international trade, though claims of Bitcoin trading on its largest exchanges remain unverified.

In the U.S., the SEC’s ruling could inspire other nations to provide similar clarity for their crypto industries. However, it also raises questions about the global regulatory patchwork. While the U.S. classifies Bitcoin as a commodity, other countries, like India, impose heavy taxes and restrictions on crypto trading. The lack of international consensus could complicate cross-border transactions and hinder Bitcoin’s adoption as a global reserve asset—a goal championed by some crypto advocates.

Looking ahead, the SEC’s decision may spur further innovation in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Miners can now operate with greater confidence, potentially leading to advancements in mining hardware, energy efficiency, and decentralized infrastructure. At the same time, the ruling underscores the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework that addresses the full spectrum of crypto activities, from trading and staking to decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The SEC’s crypto task force, led by Hester Peirce, may play a crucial role in shaping this framework, balancing innovation with investor protection.

Conclusion: A New Chapter for Bitcoin

The SEC’s confirmation that Bitcoin and Proof of Work mining are not securities is a watershed moment for the cryptocurrency industry. By providing regulatory clarity, the agency has removed a significant barrier to growth, empowering miners and reinforcing Bitcoin’s status as a commodity. Under the Trump administration’s pro-crypto policies, the U.S. is positioning itself as a leader in the global blockchain space, potentially attracting investment and talent to its shores.

However, the ruling is not a panacea. Challenges remain, from environmental concerns to the regulatory status of other crypto activities. As the industry celebrates this victory, it must also prepare for the next phase of its evolution—one that will require collaboration between regulators, innovators, and the global community to fully realize Bitcoin’s potential. For now, the message from the SEC is clear: Bitcoin mining is free to thrive, and the future looks brighter than ever for the world’s most iconic cryptocurrency.

Continue Reading
Bitcoin2 hours ago

SEC Confirms Bitcoin and Proof of Work Mining Are Not Securities: A Game-Changer for the Crypto Industry

Bitcoin2 hours ago

Argentina’s Senate Hosts Historic First Conference on Bitcoin and Regulatory Framework

Bitcoin9 hours ago

Pakistan Set to Legalize Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency with New Framework to Attract Foreign Investment

Bitcoin1 day ago

Cathie Wood’s Bold Prediction: Bitcoin to Reach $1.5 Million by 2030

Bitcoin1 day ago

Arizona’s Bitcoin and Crypto Strategic Reserve Bill Clears Commerce Committee in 6-4 Vote

Bitcoin1 day ago

North Carolina Poised to Invest Up to 10% of Public Funds in Bitcoin with New Reserve Bill

Bitcoin1 day ago

President Trump’s Executive Director on Digital Assets Signals Aggressive Bitcoin Acquisition for Strategic Reserve

Bitcoin1 day ago

China Shifts Stance: Personal Ownership of Bitcoin and Crypto Now Permitted

Bitcoin2 days ago

Fidelity Bolsters Bitcoin Holdings with $127 Million Purchase Amid Institutional Surge

Bitcoin2 days ago

Japanese Public Company Metaplanet Raises ¥2 Billion to Bolster Bitcoin Holdings

Bitcoin2 days ago

Spot ETFs Surge: $274 Million Bitcoin Inflow Marks Highest in Six Weeks

Bitcoin4 days ago

Brazil’s Bold Step: New Bill Seeks to Legalize Bitcoin for Salaries and Benefits

Bitcoin4 days ago

Rep. Byron Donalds Moves to Codify Trump’s Bitcoin Reserve Executive Order into Law

Bitcoin4 days ago

Gemini Soars to New Heights: Wins Guinness World Record with Largest Bitcoin Drone Display

Bitcoin4 days ago

LUNC Staking Gains Momentum: A Growing Force in Terra Classic’s Revival

Bitcoin4 days ago

El Salvador Doubles Down on Bitcoin, Buys the Dip to Bolster Strategic Reserve

Bitcoin1 week ago

The Bitcoin Act: A Bold Proposal to Buy 1 Million BTC Under Consideration by Congress

Bitcoin1 week ago

Bank of Russia Greenlights Bitcoin and Crypto Purchases for Qualified Investors in Landmark Move

Bitcoin1 week ago

Michael Saylor’s Bold Prediction: Bitcoin to Become the World’s Largest Asset in 48 Months

Bitcoin1 week ago

Newmarket Capital CEO Proposes Bold $2 Trillion Bit Bonds Plan to Boost U.S. Bitcoin Reserves

Bitcoin1 week ago

Deutsche Boerse to launch Bitcoin custody for institutional clients

Bitcoin1 week ago

Singapore Stock Exchange to Launch Bitcoin Perpetual Futures Contracts in 2025

Bitcoin1 week ago

BBVA to Launch Bitcoin and Crypto Trading in Spain

Bitcoin2 weeks ago

The U.S. Crypto Reserve: A Bold Leap into the Future of Finance

Bitcoin1 month ago

Japan to Classify Bitcoin as Financial Products Like Securities – Nikkei

Bitcoin1 week ago

Michael Saylor’s Bold Prediction: Bitcoin to Become the World’s Largest Asset in 48 Months

Bitcoin1 week ago

BBVA to Launch Bitcoin and Crypto Trading in Spain

Bitcoin2 weeks ago

The U.S. Crypto Reserve: A Bold Leap into the Future of Finance

Bitcoin1 week ago

Newmarket Capital CEO Proposes Bold $2 Trillion Bit Bonds Plan to Boost U.S. Bitcoin Reserves

Bitcoin1 week ago

The Bitcoin Act: A Bold Proposal to Buy 1 Million BTC Under Consideration by Congress

Bitcoin1 day ago

Cathie Wood’s Bold Prediction: Bitcoin to Reach $1.5 Million by 2030

Bitcoin1 week ago

Deutsche Boerse to launch Bitcoin custody for institutional clients

Bitcoin1 day ago

Arizona’s Bitcoin and Crypto Strategic Reserve Bill Clears Commerce Committee in 6-4 Vote

Bitcoin1 week ago

Singapore Stock Exchange to Launch Bitcoin Perpetual Futures Contracts in 2025

Bitcoin4 days ago

Brazil’s Bold Step: New Bill Seeks to Legalize Bitcoin for Salaries and Benefits

Bitcoin2 days ago

Japanese Public Company Metaplanet Raises ¥2 Billion to Bolster Bitcoin Holdings

Bitcoin1 week ago

Bank of Russia Greenlights Bitcoin and Crypto Purchases for Qualified Investors in Landmark Move

Bitcoin4 days ago

Gemini Soars to New Heights: Wins Guinness World Record with Largest Bitcoin Drone Display

Bitcoin4 days ago

LUNC Staking Gains Momentum: A Growing Force in Terra Classic’s Revival

Bitcoin2 days ago

Fidelity Bolsters Bitcoin Holdings with $127 Million Purchase Amid Institutional Surge

Bitcoin4 days ago

El Salvador Doubles Down on Bitcoin, Buys the Dip to Bolster Strategic Reserve

Bitcoin1 day ago

North Carolina Poised to Invest Up to 10% of Public Funds in Bitcoin with New Reserve Bill

Bitcoin1 day ago

President Trump’s Executive Director on Digital Assets Signals Aggressive Bitcoin Acquisition for Strategic Reserve

Bitcoin4 days ago

Rep. Byron Donalds Moves to Codify Trump’s Bitcoin Reserve Executive Order into Law

Bitcoin1 day ago

China Shifts Stance: Personal Ownership of Bitcoin and Crypto Now Permitted

Bitcoin2 days ago

Spot ETFs Surge: $274 Million Bitcoin Inflow Marks Highest in Six Weeks

Bitcoin2 hours ago

Argentina’s Senate Hosts Historic First Conference on Bitcoin and Regulatory Framework

Bitcoin9 hours ago

Pakistan Set to Legalize Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency with New Framework to Attract Foreign Investment

Bitcoin2 hours ago

SEC Confirms Bitcoin and Proof of Work Mining Are Not Securities: A Game-Changer for the Crypto Industry

Advertisement

Trending