DeFi
Polygon Labs asks senators to consider apple orchard as they tax crypto

Polygon Labs used a novel analogy to explain crypto staking to Senators Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, in a letter responding to a request for comments on the taxation of digital assets — apple farming.
“Assume a group of farmers happens upon an apple orchard on ownerless property,” Polygon Labs chief legal officer Rebecca Rettig wrote in the letter. “They agree to take turns picking apples. To ensure no one cheats, each farmer is required to ante up the first 32 apples they pick. If they cheat, those apples are thrown into a river.”
“Over time, each of the farmers begins selling some of their apples, establishing a market price for them,” the example continued. “Although a system thus emerges from the aggregate of each farmer’s actions, the farmers are not taxed until they sell their apples. Stakers should be treated similarly on their newly minted tokens.”
Polygon Labs thinks potential rewards from staking should be taxed when tokens are sold, and not as they are accrued, according to the letter. Failure to do so could result in over taxation, it argued in the Sept. 8 letter, citing what it said was a long-standing tradition in the U.S. of there not being a tax event simply for exercising dominion and control over property for which there is no previous owner.
Sens. Crapo and Wyden asked for input on how to tax digital assets in July and asked for stakeholders to respond by last week. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 does not classify digital assets in a straightforward way, they said.
“This uncertainty creates complex reporting issues for taxpayers, and warrants examining how the IRC can provide clearer guidance for taxpayers on the treatment of digital asset transactions,” the lawmakers said in July in a statement.
Others also filed letters to Sens. Wyden and Crapo including the Tax Policy Center, the Coin Center and the Crypto Council for Innovation. Both senators lead the Senate Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over the Treasury Department.
Oil, gas and minerals
“When taxpayers extract oil, gas, or minerals, they are not taxed until they sell that property,” Polygon Labs’ Rettig continued. “When they breed animals, they are not taxed until they sell the animals. When they harvest crops, they are not taxed until they sell the crops. The same rule applies when taxpayers create art, manufacture goods, bake scones, affix their autograph to paper, or otherwise assume control over property that does not have a previous owner.”
Polygon Labs further argued that newly minted tokens that accrue to stakers are created by software and should not be considered as income for tax purposes. It also pointed out staking rewards can only be used after a validator un-stakes them, and it also said that taxing staking rewards only upon disposition would be the administratively easiest option.
“Tax policy should not incentivize one product type over another,” the letter continued. “In this nascent stage of blockchain development, taxing staking rewards when credited to validators risks doing just that, without materially increasing tax revenues.”
© 2023 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. CoinReporter.io and EUReporter.co does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.
Bitcoin
SEC Confirms Bitcoin and Proof of Work Mining Are Not Securities: A Game-Changer for the Crypto Industry

On March 20, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) delivered a landmark decision that has sent ripples through the cryptocurrency industry: Bitcoin and Proof of Work (PoW) mining do not constitute securities under U.S. law. This long-awaited regulatory clarification, announced by the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance, provides a significant boost to Bitcoin miners and the broader blockchain ecosystem, removing a cloud of uncertainty that has loomed over the industry for years. As the crypto sector navigates an evolving regulatory landscape under the Trump administration, this ruling could pave the way for renewed growth and innovation in the United States.
A Defining Moment for Bitcoin and PoW Mining
The SEC’s statement marks a pivotal moment for Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, and other PoW-based networks like Litecoin, Dogecoin, and Monero. The agency clarified that “Protocol Mining” on public, permissionless PoW networks does not meet the criteria of an “investment contract” under the Howey Test—a legal standard used to determine whether an asset qualifies as a security. The Howey Test, established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1946, defines a security as an investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits derived from the efforts of others. The SEC’s ruling hinges on the decentralized nature of PoW mining, where miners independently contribute computational power to secure the network and validate transactions, earning rewards in the form of newly minted Bitcoin.
The SEC emphasized that neither solo miners nor those participating in mining pools are engaging in activities that depend on the managerial efforts of others. “A miner’s Self (or Solo) Mining is not undertaken with a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others,” the agency stated. Instead, miners are performing an “administrative or ministerial” role by securing the network and receiving rewards based on the protocol’s rules. Mining pools, where multiple miners combine their computational resources to increase their chances of earning rewards, were also exempted. The SEC noted that pool operators’ roles are administrative rather than managerial, and participants retain the freedom to leave pools at any time, further underscoring the lack of a centralized authority.
This decision aligns with previous statements from U.S. regulators. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has long classified Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Dogecoin as commodities, not securities. Additionally, the SEC has consistently treated Bitcoin as distinct from other cryptocurrencies. As far back as 2018, then-SEC Director of Corporate Finance William Hinman declared that Bitcoin and Ether were not securities due to their decentralized structures. More recently, in 2023, former SEC Chair Gary Gensler reiterated that Bitcoin is the only cryptocurrency he would call a commodity, citing its lack of a central issuer—a key factor in the SEC’s current ruling on PoW mining.
Implications for the Crypto Industry
The SEC’s clarification has far-reaching implications for Bitcoin miners and the broader crypto industry. For years, miners in the United States have operated under regulatory uncertainty, fearing that their activities might be deemed securities transactions, subjecting them to stringent registration and reporting requirements. This ruling removes that burden, providing legal certainty that miners—whether solo or in pools—do not need to register their activities with the SEC or seek exemptions under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Cody Carbone, president of The Digital Chamber, a blockchain advocacy group, called the decision “big news” for Bitcoin miners. “This gives much-needed legal certainty and clears the path for the mining industry to grow in the U.S.,” Carbone stated in a post on X. Indeed, the ruling could encourage more mining operations to establish or expand in the United States, potentially positioning the country as a global leader in Bitcoin mining. The U.S. already ranks as the top destination for Bitcoin mining, hosting over 37% of the global hashrate as of 2023, according to the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index. With regulatory clarity, this share could grow further, attracting investment and fostering innovation in mining infrastructure.
The decision also bolsters confidence in Bitcoin as an asset. By reaffirming that Bitcoin is not a security, the SEC reinforces its status as a commodity, aligning with the CFTC’s jurisdiction. This could pave the way for more institutional adoption, particularly following the SEC’s approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in January 2024. Investors may now feel more secure knowing that Bitcoin’s foundational activity—mining—operates outside the SEC’s securities framework, reducing the risk of regulatory overreach.
A Shift Under the Trump Administration
The SEC’s ruling comes amid a broader shift in the U.S. government’s approach to cryptocurrency under President Donald Trump’s administration. Since taking office in January 2025, Trump has positioned himself as a pro-crypto leader, vowing to make the U.S. a global hub for blockchain and digital assets. His administration has taken several crypto-friendly steps, including the establishment of the Council of Advisers on Digital Assets to develop industry-friendly regulations. The SEC, now led by Republican acting Chair Mark Uyeda following Gary Gensler’s departure, has also adopted a more accommodating stance. Recent actions include rescinding controversial crypto accounting guidance, dropping enforcement actions against major crypto players, and re-examining rules affecting the industry.
This ruling on PoW mining is the latest in a series of moves that signal a friendlier regulatory environment. Just days ago, the SEC released a statement on memecoins, and a newly formed crypto task force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, is set to meet to discuss the “security status” of various digital assets. These developments suggest that the SEC is reevaluating its approach to crypto, moving away from the enforcement-heavy strategy of the Gensler era, which saw 26 crypto-related enforcement actions in 2023 alone.
A Critical Perspective: What’s Missing?
While the SEC’s decision has been widely celebrated, it’s worth examining what the ruling does not address. The statement focuses narrowly on PoW mining and does not extend to Proof of Stake (PoS) networks like Ethereum, which transitioned to PoS in 2022. PoS networks often involve staking, where users lock up tokens to validate transactions and earn rewards—a process that some argue could meet the Howey Test’s criteria due to its reliance on network operators or validators. The SEC has previously targeted PoS-based tokens like Solana, Cardano, and Polygon, labeling them as securities in lawsuits against exchanges like Coinbase and Binance in 2023. The lack of clarity on PoS mechanisms leaves a significant portion of the crypto industry in regulatory limbo.
Moreover, the SEC’s ruling does not address the broader question of how Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies should be regulated beyond mining. While Bitcoin itself is not a security, its use in financial products, trading platforms, and lending or staking services could still attract scrutiny. The SEC has warned investors about the risks of crypto asset securities, noting that unregistered platforms may lack investor protections. The agency’s enforcement actions against exchanges and DeFi platforms suggest that regulatory challenges persist, even as mining receives a green light.
Another point of concern is the environmental impact of PoW mining, which the SEC’s statement does not address. Bitcoin mining consumes significant energy—estimated at 127 terawatt-hours annually by the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index, more than the entire country of Norway. Critics argue that this energy-intensive process contributes to climate change, and some governments have imposed restrictions on mining activities. While the SEC’s ruling focuses on securities law, future regulations from other agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, could impact the industry’s growth.
Global Context and Future Outlook
The SEC’s decision comes at a time when global attitudes toward Bitcoin are shifting. Countries like Argentina and Pakistan, as reported earlier this year, are exploring crypto-friendly policies to attract investment and combat economic instability. Argentina’s Senate recently hosted its first-ever conference on Bitcoin and regulatory frameworks, while Pakistan is reportedly set to legalize Bitcoin to attract foreign investment. Meanwhile, Russia has legalized crypto mining and is experimenting with stablecoins for international trade, though claims of Bitcoin trading on its largest exchanges remain unverified.
In the U.S., the SEC’s ruling could inspire other nations to provide similar clarity for their crypto industries. However, it also raises questions about the global regulatory patchwork. While the U.S. classifies Bitcoin as a commodity, other countries, like India, impose heavy taxes and restrictions on crypto trading. The lack of international consensus could complicate cross-border transactions and hinder Bitcoin’s adoption as a global reserve asset—a goal championed by some crypto advocates.
Looking ahead, the SEC’s decision may spur further innovation in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Miners can now operate with greater confidence, potentially leading to advancements in mining hardware, energy efficiency, and decentralized infrastructure. At the same time, the ruling underscores the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework that addresses the full spectrum of crypto activities, from trading and staking to decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The SEC’s crypto task force, led by Hester Peirce, may play a crucial role in shaping this framework, balancing innovation with investor protection.
Conclusion: A New Chapter for Bitcoin
The SEC’s confirmation that Bitcoin and Proof of Work mining are not securities is a watershed moment for the cryptocurrency industry. By providing regulatory clarity, the agency has removed a significant barrier to growth, empowering miners and reinforcing Bitcoin’s status as a commodity. Under the Trump administration’s pro-crypto policies, the U.S. is positioning itself as a leader in the global blockchain space, potentially attracting investment and talent to its shores.
However, the ruling is not a panacea. Challenges remain, from environmental concerns to the regulatory status of other crypto activities. As the industry celebrates this victory, it must also prepare for the next phase of its evolution—one that will require collaboration between regulators, innovators, and the global community to fully realize Bitcoin’s potential. For now, the message from the SEC is clear: Bitcoin mining is free to thrive, and the future looks brighter than ever for the world’s most iconic cryptocurrency.
-
Bitcoin2 years ago
XHYRE Revolutionising Technology for Digital Assets
-
Bitcoin2 years ago
Rapper Liroy – Piotr Krzysztof Marzec Invests in Blockchain
-
Bitcoin2 years ago
Blockchain: HUBBURGER offers its collection of NFTs
-
Bitcoin2 years ago
Interview with a Saitama blockchain Industry Expert Russell Armand
-
Bitcoin2 years ago
New blockchain investment platform launched
-
Bitcoin2 years ago
The Future of Bitcoin, CBDCs, NFTs, and GameFi: Insights from OKX
-
Events2 years ago
London is the Next Station for The Internationally Overarching Blockchain Summit
-
Crypto2 years ago
Is Terra Luna Classic on the Brink of a Major Breakthrough?